Chiron Exams All exams Ask for access

All exams › ISTQB

CTAL-TA practice examsIn development

ISTQB Advanced Level Test Analyst

ISTQB · advanced · 120 minutes, with extra time for non-native speakers

In developmentThis course is still being brought to our full standard. The questions and notes are usable, but they have not yet been checked line by line against the vendor’s own training.

The advanced track for functional and exploratory specialists: what the analyst contributes at each stage of the process and why reviewing the test basis is where defects are cheapest, risk deciding both what is tested and what is dropped, choosing the technique from the shape of the requirement, defect taxonomies and session-based exploration; then the business-facing quality characteristics with appropriateness distinguished from correctness, usability and accessibility with real users, review checklists, actionable defect reports, and the tools an analyst actually uses.

What you get

120practice questions
3full papers of 40
2course chapters · 13 minutes
100%answers explained

Papers are cut from the bank and weighted like the real exam, and no question appears in two of them. Every wrong answer comes back on later days until you have it right.

What the exam covers

The domains our question bank is built on. We have not yet transcribed this vendor’s own outline for this exam.

The test process and specification-based techniquesNot published
Quality characteristics, reviews, defects and toolsNot published

Two sample questions

Two of the 120, with the answer and the explanation.

1. Why does a confirmed fix still require regression testing?

  1. Confirmation testing cannot be automated
  2. The original test may no longer be valid
  3. Regression testing measures the coverage
  4. A fix can break behaviour elsewhere — correct

Why: Fixing one defect can break something else, so regression testing checks that the change did not damage previously working behaviour, which confirmation of the fix alone does not.

2. Why does the analyst combine dynamic testing with participation in reviews?

  1. Reviews and tests apply the same coverage criteria
  2. Reviews are cheaper so they replace testing
  3. Dynamic testing cannot find requirement defects
  4. Reviews catch work product faults, tests catch runtime ones — correct

Why: Static reviews find defects in documents and designs before execution, while dynamic testing finds those in the running system, so combining them covers defects neither would catch alone.

The real CTAL-TA exam

Length120 minutes, with extra time for non-native speakers
Questions40
Pass mark65%
PriceSold through national ISTQB boards and accredited providers
Recommended before you sit itISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level is required.
Valid forDoes not expire

Exam facts as published by ISTQB; always check the vendor’s page before you book.

Study CTAL-TA with Chiron

Chiron is invitation-only while we are in beta, and nothing is for sale yet: invited accounts use every paper, drill and course note for free.